Visit marcowhm's column >>

MARCOWHM

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 73
Member Since: 1/2008Last Seen: 11/25/2009

Poll: Lingering racism may hurt Obama - Decision '08- msnbc.com

Read ArticleArticle Source: msnbc.com
advertisement

Deep-seated racial misgivings could cost Barack Obama the White House if the election is close, according to an AP-Yahoo News poll that found one-third of white Democrats harbor negative views toward blacks — many calling them "lazy," "violent" or responsible for their own troubles.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.1
{"commentId":3058211,"authorDomain":"bellavida369"}

Here's the headline:
'Deep-seated racial misgivings could cost Barack Obama the White House if the election is close, according to an AP-Yahoo News poll that found one-third of white Democrats harbor negative views toward blacks.'

Here is another detail though, mentioned in passing:
'On the other side of the racial question, the Illinois Democrat is drawing almost unanimous support from blacks, the poll shows, though that probably wouldn't be enough to counter the negative effect of some whites' views.'

The focus of this story is the attitudes within one demographic group, being described as racist- but this attitude is not described as racist when applied towards another. Why not? It seems obvious that there is a problem of uniting certain voters for Obama. There is nothing new about this story, except it is no longer an abstract idea that a black candidate is now in Obama's position. This though is a familiar mantra of a media trying to force Democratic voters to get back into line, by rather crudely implying that a sign of 'racist' should hang on anyone who doesn't vote for this candidate. It is more than interesting how no statistics are stated for other demographic groups concerning 'racist' feelings- why are they not included here? Probably because this is being tailored to the demographic group that needs to be used in this case. Enough with the racial bias, media- it exists in all racial groups, unfortunately.

{"commentId":3058211,"threadId":"365376","contentId":"1890669","authorDomain":"bellavida369"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:47 PM EDT
{"commentId":3081452,"authorDomain":"marcowhm"}

I agree with your assertion. Refusing to vote for a candidate because of the color of his skin is wrong but so is voting for a candidate just because of the color of his skin. I think this election would look completely different if everyone voted based on the issues.

{"commentId":3081452,"threadId":"365376","contentId":"1890669","authorDomain":"marcowhm"}
    Reply#2 - Wed Sep 24, 2008 3:54 PM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"365376","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"365376","contentId":"1890669"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking